doesnt matter what type as long as its a legal case
i need ideas for a project in Law class hahaWhat are 5 important or significant legal cases?
Bushell's Case, 1670, established in English law that a juror could not be punished for failing to follow a judge's directed verdict.
Mabo vs Queensland, 1992, overturned the doctrine of terra nullius and held that Aborigines had held native title to land before European arrival.
Somersett's Case, 1772, held that slavery was illegal in England.
Brown v Board of Education, 1954, ruled that 'separate but equal' was unconstitutional in the US.
Roe v Wade, 1973, struck down US anti-abortion laws as unconstitutional.What are 5 important or significant legal cases?
brown vs board of education
i dont know the the names of the rest but...
look up
woman's movement
capitol punishment
immigration
abortion
religion in schools
etc.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
How come 75% of all Hiv/aids cases happen in africa?
I read on wikipedia that 75% of all hiv/aids cases happen in africa. is that really true? and if so why?How come 75% of all Hiv/aids cases happen in africa?
1. Africa is ground zero for the AIDS epidemic. I believe it is a simian virus that jumped to humans.
2. You have a lot of people who just haven't been educated on how AIDS is transmitted, steps that could prevent it, exc. You don't have the resources to stop its transmission, like you do in the developed world. You don't have regular opportunities to be tested, either.
3. Poverty in a lot of African nations has driven a lot of women into prostitution. Mozambique, for example, comes to my mind as one such country that had these problems. Poverty raises the numbers of prostitutes, the number of prostitutes raises the AIDS crisis, the AIDS crisis makes the poverty worse...and so it goes...
4. Once you've passed a certain threshold of people who have AIDS in your country, it becomes difficult to keep in check.
PeaceHow come 75% of all Hiv/aids cases happen in africa?
HIV originated in Africa so it was the first place it spread.
Also the nations of Africa are extremely poor. Many of them can barely feed their own people, so providing things like health care services and proper education is beyond their ability.
Its also reached a stage where such a large percentage of the population has HIV in some countries that it is impossible to contain.
Many don't get tested; those that are infected, they spread it by sexual intercourse. Another factor is due to a cultural belief in Africa that AIDS is cured when you have sex with a virgin. Needless to say, the woman who is raped is also infected, and that creates another endless cycle of AIDS spreading.
Because the HIV users isn't limited to gays, drug users and prostitutes. In Africa the disease is spread through heterosexuals as well as gays, and prostitutes.
The lack of testing and the lack of medical care leads to more cases.
The other big problem in Africa is Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.
Is that all that you read? Did you not read about how they maybe got it? There's a lot of dirty crap that goes on in the country with this country playing a big role in it. Right here in this country there was the 'Tuskegee experiment'. And guess who the guinea pigs were? Poor black men who thought they were actually being treated but were not.
It is hard to tell every one that dies in Africa ''dies of aid'' there is a lot of money to be made off aids for these countries
There is even a little talk about circumcision helping to prevent aids but since only white males are circumcised in America it is not P C to talk of it
Aids originated in Africa for starters. Some other reasons would be Africa in most cases has poor medical treatment and a lack of testing for the disease. It is difficult to not spread a disease if you are not aware you have it.
it dates back to the origins of HIV. it came from the Green monkeys indigenous to africa. eventually the monkeys spread it to humans, and voila, you have aids in africa
Because they are an impoverished third world continent that has very little education, contraception or recreation besides sex.
Africans have a lot of unprotected sex.
IT IS TRUE..it happens because of poverty...which has been preserved in africa by environmentalists..they care more about protecting elephants and tse-tse flies than people...they have prevented africa from developing their economies...also the world wide ban on DDT kills millions every year,yet there is no credible evidence that DDT is harmful...americans dumped thousand of tons of DDT onto panama to build the canal there...no ill effects...it was the only way to be in that jungle...the mosquito's were killing everyone.as they are doing today in africa as well...
and oh yeah...they shoot poachers,don't they?
has nothing to do with education and condoms,as the liberals would have you believe...it is they who kill those people...
Blacks account for over half of the AIDS cases in the US, amazing since they only acound for 13% of the population. It is a genetic predisposition towards this lifestyle, on average.
This statistic proves its not just lack of education.
the result of uncontrolled polygamous relationships
1. Africa is ground zero for the AIDS epidemic. I believe it is a simian virus that jumped to humans.
2. You have a lot of people who just haven't been educated on how AIDS is transmitted, steps that could prevent it, exc. You don't have the resources to stop its transmission, like you do in the developed world. You don't have regular opportunities to be tested, either.
3. Poverty in a lot of African nations has driven a lot of women into prostitution. Mozambique, for example, comes to my mind as one such country that had these problems. Poverty raises the numbers of prostitutes, the number of prostitutes raises the AIDS crisis, the AIDS crisis makes the poverty worse...and so it goes...
4. Once you've passed a certain threshold of people who have AIDS in your country, it becomes difficult to keep in check.
PeaceHow come 75% of all Hiv/aids cases happen in africa?
HIV originated in Africa so it was the first place it spread.
Also the nations of Africa are extremely poor. Many of them can barely feed their own people, so providing things like health care services and proper education is beyond their ability.
Its also reached a stage where such a large percentage of the population has HIV in some countries that it is impossible to contain.
Many don't get tested; those that are infected, they spread it by sexual intercourse. Another factor is due to a cultural belief in Africa that AIDS is cured when you have sex with a virgin. Needless to say, the woman who is raped is also infected, and that creates another endless cycle of AIDS spreading.
Because the HIV users isn't limited to gays, drug users and prostitutes. In Africa the disease is spread through heterosexuals as well as gays, and prostitutes.
The lack of testing and the lack of medical care leads to more cases.
The other big problem in Africa is Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.
Is that all that you read? Did you not read about how they maybe got it? There's a lot of dirty crap that goes on in the country with this country playing a big role in it. Right here in this country there was the 'Tuskegee experiment'. And guess who the guinea pigs were? Poor black men who thought they were actually being treated but were not.
It is hard to tell every one that dies in Africa ''dies of aid'' there is a lot of money to be made off aids for these countries
There is even a little talk about circumcision helping to prevent aids but since only white males are circumcised in America it is not P C to talk of it
Aids originated in Africa for starters. Some other reasons would be Africa in most cases has poor medical treatment and a lack of testing for the disease. It is difficult to not spread a disease if you are not aware you have it.
it dates back to the origins of HIV. it came from the Green monkeys indigenous to africa. eventually the monkeys spread it to humans, and voila, you have aids in africa
Because they are an impoverished third world continent that has very little education, contraception or recreation besides sex.
Africans have a lot of unprotected sex.
IT IS TRUE..it happens because of poverty...which has been preserved in africa by environmentalists..they care more about protecting elephants and tse-tse flies than people...they have prevented africa from developing their economies...also the world wide ban on DDT kills millions every year,yet there is no credible evidence that DDT is harmful...americans dumped thousand of tons of DDT onto panama to build the canal there...no ill effects...it was the only way to be in that jungle...the mosquito's were killing everyone.as they are doing today in africa as well...
and oh yeah...they shoot poachers,don't they?
has nothing to do with education and condoms,as the liberals would have you believe...it is they who kill those people...
Blacks account for over half of the AIDS cases in the US, amazing since they only acound for 13% of the population. It is a genetic predisposition towards this lifestyle, on average.
This statistic proves its not just lack of education.
the result of uncontrolled polygamous relationships
Is it true that in some cases Yahoo Employees can confiscate your computer for too many Violations of TOS??
A friend of mine claims that there is a way yahoo can take your computer away without a warrant. Just for violating certain terms of their TOS.
I really dont want them to take away my laptop. I really like it and spent alot of money to buy it.
But everyday I am Petrified and in fear that if I ask the wrong question , that yahoo will come to my house while im doing a clown gig and take my laptop.
Should I buy a spare laptop just in case?
I was also told not to even bother calling the police because they are under Yahoo's payroll.
Do you think Yahoo will one day become in control of the USA and become our government?Is it true that in some cases Yahoo Employees can confiscate your computer for too many Violations of TOS??
i would love for a employee of yahoo to show up at my door demanding my pc , oh how i would love that . trust me it would make the 6 o'clock newsIs it true that in some cases Yahoo Employees can confiscate your computer for too many Violations of TOS??
YaaaaaHoooo I'm a drinkin tonight!!!!
UMMMmmm NO to all questions.
Yes they can.
You should run away to Canada right now.
I'll cover for you.
I don't believe that any of that is true.
No. But you could have your account deleted.
Don't be silly!
Yes, in fact I have heard they can get your house too. They'll turn it into yet another site to monitor TOS violations.
Watch for Benjamin Netanyahu and his ilk to continue to control the press and the news. ::burp::
No. Use a shotgun for basic home defense.
No they cannot, They can only stop your service. If you really believe any of this and are above the age of 12 you should try to get away from the computer and TV and learn something outside or at least visit some educational sites.
B S
They can only ban you from their services. As far as the rest of your question, you've been watching too many X Files reruns.coupons
I really dont want them to take away my laptop. I really like it and spent alot of money to buy it.
But everyday I am Petrified and in fear that if I ask the wrong question , that yahoo will come to my house while im doing a clown gig and take my laptop.
Should I buy a spare laptop just in case?
I was also told not to even bother calling the police because they are under Yahoo's payroll.
Do you think Yahoo will one day become in control of the USA and become our government?Is it true that in some cases Yahoo Employees can confiscate your computer for too many Violations of TOS??
i would love for a employee of yahoo to show up at my door demanding my pc , oh how i would love that . trust me it would make the 6 o'clock newsIs it true that in some cases Yahoo Employees can confiscate your computer for too many Violations of TOS??
YaaaaaHoooo I'm a drinkin tonight!!!!
UMMMmmm NO to all questions.
Yes they can.
You should run away to Canada right now.
I'll cover for you.
I don't believe that any of that is true.
No. But you could have your account deleted.
Don't be silly!
Yes, in fact I have heard they can get your house too. They'll turn it into yet another site to monitor TOS violations.
Watch for Benjamin Netanyahu and his ilk to continue to control the press and the news. ::burp::
No. Use a shotgun for basic home defense.
No they cannot, They can only stop your service. If you really believe any of this and are above the age of 12 you should try to get away from the computer and TV and learn something outside or at least visit some educational sites.
B S
They can only ban you from their services. As far as the rest of your question, you've been watching too many X Files reruns.
Poll: Do you think the 4 cases of Keystone I have in my car will freeze, or should they be fine until 5:00?
I guess if they do we're having beer slushies tonight.Poll: Do you think the 4 cases of Keystone I have in my car will freeze, or should they be fine until 5:00?
They will be fine, at least they won't be ';Bitter';
Is the Maverick having a sale on Keystone?
4 cases of beer in the morning is kind of an odd purchase.Poll: Do you think the 4 cases of Keystone I have in my car will freeze, or should they be fine until 5:00?
that's kind of silly, because it depends on where you're parked, as in what state you live in. if it snows where you live, you'd better take them inside or they will explode. i left cans of diet dr. pepper in my trunk, and wht a mess.
ahh...the dirty thirty of 'Stones....my mouth is a watering as I type.
u'll be fine... if u need any help drink'n it i might be able to make it but u have to give me notice ;)... i might live far away... i'm in pa... keep it real... and have fun at the party... later
Well its Keystone which is 98% water (at least it taste that way). To answer your question I would say they will freeze.
yummy keystone. depends on the temp outside. if it is under 20 degrees, it probably will freeze
alcohol freezes at -114 degrees C. good luck freezing that.
Keystone? That is sick. I will lend you some cash to buy some good beer.
lol, just pull them in and keep them under your desk, tuck them in with a nice blankey and keep them safe.
:)
how cold is it outside? I think you should be fine.
if it gets below about 28 cheap beer freezes
who cares?
just leave it unlocked...ill keep an eye on it for you... empty cans dont freeze.
just put it in the fridge
They will be fine, at least they won't be ';Bitter';
Is the Maverick having a sale on Keystone?
4 cases of beer in the morning is kind of an odd purchase.Poll: Do you think the 4 cases of Keystone I have in my car will freeze, or should they be fine until 5:00?
that's kind of silly, because it depends on where you're parked, as in what state you live in. if it snows where you live, you'd better take them inside or they will explode. i left cans of diet dr. pepper in my trunk, and wht a mess.
ahh...the dirty thirty of 'Stones....my mouth is a watering as I type.
u'll be fine... if u need any help drink'n it i might be able to make it but u have to give me notice ;)... i might live far away... i'm in pa... keep it real... and have fun at the party... later
Well its Keystone which is 98% water (at least it taste that way). To answer your question I would say they will freeze.
yummy keystone. depends on the temp outside. if it is under 20 degrees, it probably will freeze
alcohol freezes at -114 degrees C. good luck freezing that.
Keystone? That is sick. I will lend you some cash to buy some good beer.
lol, just pull them in and keep them under your desk, tuck them in with a nice blankey and keep them safe.
:)
how cold is it outside? I think you should be fine.
if it gets below about 28 cheap beer freezes
who cares?
just leave it unlocked...ill keep an eye on it for you... empty cans dont freeze.
just put it in the fridge
Where to find a blank body diagram to use for scar reporting in abuse cases?
http://www.medicalexhibits.com/cgi-bin/g鈥?/a>
I hope everything's alright :[
I hope everything's alright :[
Bush threatens vetos of childrens health care aid for working poor families, not welfare cases.?
these are not welfare cases. The GOP argues that the war in Iraq is justified to spend 750,000,000 a day but poor families hav eto use their paltry earnings to back up their kids needs. Does that ring alarm bells? Its okay to funnel billions to war cartels and oil cartels but the hell with poor familes. Wake up and fac ewhat this admn'tn is for, the rich elite scamming any way they can to get billions for their private coffers! Bush also threatened to veto a clean water funding of 27 million,, this is after he got his 200 billion for iraq!!! Read the book ';War is a Raquet'; by a general. This man Bush is a demon!Bush threatens vetos of childrens health care aid for working poor families, not welfare cases.?
I wish people would do thier homework instead of telling those who ask the questions to do theirs!!! The bill doesn't state people earning 83,000 a year could quailfy. Eligibility is NOT changing. Bush keeps saying that b/c once again he's lying to the American pubilc. Has he lied before to get his way? The bill states a family of 4 making just about 41,000 could qualify. Have you ever considered how hard making 41,000 a year could be for a widow of 3 children when the cost of health care is skyrocketing every year? People are so stupid to keep using the same idea of 83,000 a year when that is not even the info in the bill. Before you answer with ignorance check out the bill and stop listening to the President!! Bush is all about the Rich and OIL. Why do you think we're in Iraq in the first place? He wanted to finish his father's job, and get oil, which means more money for him. Did you hear the arguments tonight before the house voted? I did because I believe in informing myself. Maybe you should try. And to answer your question....I know these are not welfare cases. They are cases of people trying to get help becaue healthcare is so expensive and Bush could care less. When you've never lived poor you have no idea what it's like to struggle for what you have. Why make the children suffer? Selfish people!!Bush threatens vetos of childrens health care aid for working poor families, not welfare cases.?
It is pretty bad when you realize that eighty thousand a year isn't millionaire status. A brief breakdown of housing costs, school and property taxes, alone will disabuse those to whom it seems like rich. In truth it is just middle class, and one of the reasons its been extended to the middle class is that businesses have decreased coverage in the workplace.
Family coverage is at a minimum $12,000 per annum.
Try feeding, housing, clothing, transportation, life insurance, house insurance, and see what you have left for college for the kids. Let alone health insurance.
Bush may not truly be a demon, but he can't offer an option either, in one speech he says they can go to the ER.
Bet hes never been in one. Hes clueless and he doesn't want to learn. Not only that but with his ER system, we still pay for it.
It is up to eighty thousand a year in the new law, it was less in the old one which was bipartisan and enacted in 97.
Agreed!
So you think children are children up to the age of 25 and poverty is over 80 grand a year? LOL....Learn your topic. NO to socialism.
...it sounds like you're easy to fool and quite taken in by political games, distortion and partial truths.
Warm regards,
Douglas
You obviously haven't researched and thought about it before asking this.
The bill was supposed to renew the S-chip program for the children of the poor, BUT congress is trying to slip a bit of socialist rhetoric through piggybacked to this bill, stating that anyone making less than 83,000 a year has entitlements to what's supposed to be a supplement for the poor, not the middle class.
The last time I checked, anyone making 40,000-83,000 a year were not ';the working poor'; or ';welfare cases.'; It should be vetoed repeatedly until they learn this is not a socialist, hand-out society. In fact, it should be left up to the states considering wages differ via the cost of living of said area (for example, 50,000 a year for a family may very well be considered poor in LA or NYC, but well-off in the midwest).
Like Bush himself said, it's a step toward federalization and socialism, which includes the highest tax increase in history to pay for it.
yes you are paying attention
He needs to continue to fund the illegals in this country to appease his Mexican counter parts to continue the rush into the North American Union
He doesn't want to get anyone angry before the deal is finalized and complete!
Ah, thanks for not answering my question...
If you don't know what is being asked then best to leave it be.
My status has nothing to do with having a job you ********.
By the way, what's with the long question ???
Get a life....
I have mixed emotions, few want children to be denied health are, but from what I had read not only does it cover the kids but in some cases the parents as well I also think it takes away the responsible of the parents to provide for their children. I have seen some friends and relatives that the opportunity to get health insurance from their work, but opted out because the premiums were too high, but then took vacations and purchased news cars. I do not feel I should have to use my tax dollars to cover their choices
I wish people would do thier homework instead of telling those who ask the questions to do theirs!!! The bill doesn't state people earning 83,000 a year could quailfy. Eligibility is NOT changing. Bush keeps saying that b/c once again he's lying to the American pubilc. Has he lied before to get his way? The bill states a family of 4 making just about 41,000 could qualify. Have you ever considered how hard making 41,000 a year could be for a widow of 3 children when the cost of health care is skyrocketing every year? People are so stupid to keep using the same idea of 83,000 a year when that is not even the info in the bill. Before you answer with ignorance check out the bill and stop listening to the President!! Bush is all about the Rich and OIL. Why do you think we're in Iraq in the first place? He wanted to finish his father's job, and get oil, which means more money for him. Did you hear the arguments tonight before the house voted? I did because I believe in informing myself. Maybe you should try. And to answer your question....I know these are not welfare cases. They are cases of people trying to get help becaue healthcare is so expensive and Bush could care less. When you've never lived poor you have no idea what it's like to struggle for what you have. Why make the children suffer? Selfish people!!Bush threatens vetos of childrens health care aid for working poor families, not welfare cases.?
It is pretty bad when you realize that eighty thousand a year isn't millionaire status. A brief breakdown of housing costs, school and property taxes, alone will disabuse those to whom it seems like rich. In truth it is just middle class, and one of the reasons its been extended to the middle class is that businesses have decreased coverage in the workplace.
Family coverage is at a minimum $12,000 per annum.
Try feeding, housing, clothing, transportation, life insurance, house insurance, and see what you have left for college for the kids. Let alone health insurance.
Bush may not truly be a demon, but he can't offer an option either, in one speech he says they can go to the ER.
Bet hes never been in one. Hes clueless and he doesn't want to learn. Not only that but with his ER system, we still pay for it.
It is up to eighty thousand a year in the new law, it was less in the old one which was bipartisan and enacted in 97.
Agreed!
So you think children are children up to the age of 25 and poverty is over 80 grand a year? LOL....Learn your topic. NO to socialism.
...it sounds like you're easy to fool and quite taken in by political games, distortion and partial truths.
Warm regards,
Douglas
You obviously haven't researched and thought about it before asking this.
The bill was supposed to renew the S-chip program for the children of the poor, BUT congress is trying to slip a bit of socialist rhetoric through piggybacked to this bill, stating that anyone making less than 83,000 a year has entitlements to what's supposed to be a supplement for the poor, not the middle class.
The last time I checked, anyone making 40,000-83,000 a year were not ';the working poor'; or ';welfare cases.'; It should be vetoed repeatedly until they learn this is not a socialist, hand-out society. In fact, it should be left up to the states considering wages differ via the cost of living of said area (for example, 50,000 a year for a family may very well be considered poor in LA or NYC, but well-off in the midwest).
Like Bush himself said, it's a step toward federalization and socialism, which includes the highest tax increase in history to pay for it.
yes you are paying attention
He needs to continue to fund the illegals in this country to appease his Mexican counter parts to continue the rush into the North American Union
He doesn't want to get anyone angry before the deal is finalized and complete!
Ah, thanks for not answering my question...
If you don't know what is being asked then best to leave it be.
My status has nothing to do with having a job you ********.
By the way, what's with the long question ???
Get a life....
I have mixed emotions, few want children to be denied health are, but from what I had read not only does it cover the kids but in some cases the parents as well I also think it takes away the responsible of the parents to provide for their children. I have seen some friends and relatives that the opportunity to get health insurance from their work, but opted out because the premiums were too high, but then took vacations and purchased news cars. I do not feel I should have to use my tax dollars to cover their choices
What are some supreme court cases related to sex discrimination? (Specifics below)?
Specifically, sex discrimination in the corporate work environment based on appearance/image and not attending after hours functions due to parental responsibilities?What are some supreme court cases related to sex discrimination? (Specifics below)?
Can you be more specific? It's unlikely that there is any Supreme Court case that fits what you request because appearance and parental responsibilitie do not necessarily implicate sex. What is your actual fact situation?
Can you be more specific? It's unlikely that there is any Supreme Court case that fits what you request because appearance and parental responsibilitie do not necessarily implicate sex. What is your actual fact situation?
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)