I'm getting an Ipod nano 3rd generation soon and I want to get a case for it. The case I saw that I liked the best was a denim flip case. But I don't know if it flips up or down, or both. Could some body help me with this?A question about Ipod flip cases?
it should say that on the box, check the back.
i wish i could help you more, but there is such a range of cases, that finding one that flips the way you like, and looks great shouldn't be too hard. happy shopping!
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Are all neoprene laptop cases water resistant?
is neoprene in itself water resistant or is a laptop case only water resistant if it is specified?Are all neoprene laptop cases water resistant?
The problem with neoprene cases is the seams. While neoprene may be waterproof, unless the seams are treated, they are just a bunch of holes-
Look for a case that says water-resistant.
The problem with neoprene cases is the seams. While neoprene may be waterproof, unless the seams are treated, they are just a bunch of holes-
Look for a case that says water-resistant.
Which rape/sex scandal cases also featured semen-stained dresses or torn dresses as legal evidence?
former Pres. Bill Clinton vs. Monica Lewinski
Do people have a right to end their own lives in cases of painful terminal illness? ?
Why are why not?Do people have a right to end their own lives in cases of painful terminal illness? ?
I think they have a right to decide for themselves. They say its inhuman to let a dog suffer through cancer or some other terminal illness so why should it be any different for humans?Do people have a right to end their own lives in cases of painful terminal illness? ?
All people have the right to end their own lives. Most people realize that it's not the best choice. If there is a disease that someone WILL die from and is miserable, there are pain medications that can be prescribed to ease the misery. There is no disease on earth worth taking your life for though. Usually, all can be fixed with a healthy dose of reality!
the law says no they dont. but they should, its there decision and no one elses.
Yes they do...
I think they have a right to decide for themselves. They say its inhuman to let a dog suffer through cancer or some other terminal illness so why should it be any different for humans?Do people have a right to end their own lives in cases of painful terminal illness? ?
All people have the right to end their own lives. Most people realize that it's not the best choice. If there is a disease that someone WILL die from and is miserable, there are pain medications that can be prescribed to ease the misery. There is no disease on earth worth taking your life for though. Usually, all can be fixed with a healthy dose of reality!
the law says no they dont. but they should, its there decision and no one elses.
Yes they do...
I have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?
My Title VII case was against a federal government agency. The treatment I received by filing a discrimmination case was the worst dealing with terrorism I have ever encountered. I have proof that would put the federal government to shame. How can I request an investigation into this matter?I have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?
The press is always goodI have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?
Contact the ACLU. http://www.aclu.com
They specialize in just these kinds of cases.
Contact info at http://www.aclu.com/contact/index.htmlgood makeup
The press is always goodI have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?
Contact the ACLU. http://www.aclu.com
They specialize in just these kinds of cases.
Contact info at http://www.aclu.com/contact/index.html
What are some interesting recent Supreme Court cases?
years between 2003-2007 thanxx
Sincerly, BrooklynWhat are some interesting recent Supreme Court cases?
U. S. Supreme Court: Roper v. Simmons, No. 03-633. By a vote of 5-4, the U.S. Supreme Court on March 1, 2005 held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the execution of offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed.
Atkins v. Virginia: The U.S. Supreme Court Declares the Execution of Persons with Mental Retardation UnconstitutionalWhat are some interesting recent Supreme Court cases?
The most interesting is some they will not hear---most recent is one concerning the first amendent---the last ten words.---They in effect will not rule on a constitutional question of vast importance to this nation...
Sincerly, BrooklynWhat are some interesting recent Supreme Court cases?
U. S. Supreme Court: Roper v. Simmons, No. 03-633. By a vote of 5-4, the U.S. Supreme Court on March 1, 2005 held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the execution of offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed.
Atkins v. Virginia: The U.S. Supreme Court Declares the Execution of Persons with Mental Retardation UnconstitutionalWhat are some interesting recent Supreme Court cases?
The most interesting is some they will not hear---most recent is one concerning the first amendent---the last ten words.---They in effect will not rule on a constitutional question of vast importance to this nation...
A question about double jeopardy and murder cases w/no body?
say you were acquitted of murdering a person, and there was no body. that person turned up alive later...and then mysteriously died...could you be tried for their murder if the clues led to you?A question about double jeopardy and murder cases w/no body?
We are protected from double jeopardy by laws that prohibit us from being tried twice for the same crime. That's what ';double jeopardy'; is.
The only way a person is going to be charged with murder when there is no body would be if there were incredibly strong evidence.
But let's say a person was acquitted of murder and it was later learned that the ';murdered'; person was indeed very much alive.
The previously accused person has no connection to that individual when that individual does turn up dead unless there is evidence to the contrary.
The first trial for ';murder'; in invalid because there was no murder. A question about double jeopardy and murder cases w/no body?
If you have been tried and acquitted of a murder, you cannot be tried again for that murder. But if the law finds reason, they can seek prosecution on other charges that may be secondary to the crime.
I would think so because the first would have been a sham the person was alive then died mysteriously clues led to you I would say this is not double jeopardy
you couldn't be tried for murder but you could be tried for manslaughter
Once you were acquitted it doesn't matter what happens later...........Like O.J your freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
We are protected from double jeopardy by laws that prohibit us from being tried twice for the same crime. That's what ';double jeopardy'; is.
The only way a person is going to be charged with murder when there is no body would be if there were incredibly strong evidence.
But let's say a person was acquitted of murder and it was later learned that the ';murdered'; person was indeed very much alive.
The previously accused person has no connection to that individual when that individual does turn up dead unless there is evidence to the contrary.
The first trial for ';murder'; in invalid because there was no murder. A question about double jeopardy and murder cases w/no body?
If you have been tried and acquitted of a murder, you cannot be tried again for that murder. But if the law finds reason, they can seek prosecution on other charges that may be secondary to the crime.
I would think so because the first would have been a sham the person was alive then died mysteriously clues led to you I would say this is not double jeopardy
you couldn't be tried for murder but you could be tried for manslaughter
Once you were acquitted it doesn't matter what happens later...........Like O.J your freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)